Sejanus: His Fall — A Reader’s Guide

  6   1
Jonson, Ben, 1573?-1637 Project Gutenberg 2004
Tragedies (Drama); Sejanus, Lucius Aelius, -31 -- Drama; Rome -- History -- Tiberius, 14-37 -- Drama Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words: 51,667
Reading time: 225 min
Text sections: 14
Ben Jonson's 1603 tragedy dramatizes the rise and fall of the Roman emperor Tiberius's powerful minister, Sejanus. The play is notable for its dense classical allusions, scholarly apparatus, and a stark portrayal of political intrigue and betrayal. Jonson's language is precise and forensic, with characters often speaking in legalistic or conspiratorial tones. The excerpts reveal a world where surveillance and informants are routine, and where loyalty is a commodity. Jonson's use of verse varies
Share

Ben Jonson's Sejanus: His Fall opens not with a grand prologue but with a direct address to readers, a choice that signals the play's self-conscious engagement with its sources. Jonson appended 247 scholarly footnotes—mostly in Latin—to the original text, a practice unusual for a stage play. This editorial apparatus, elided in the present edition, underscores Jonson's ambition to present his tragedy as a work of historical reconstruction, not mere invention. The play's language is correspondingly dense, with characters often speaking in clipped, tactical exchanges that mirror the conspiratorial atmosphere of Tiberius's Rome.

Diction of Surveillance and Betrayal

The excerpts repeatedly foreground a vocabulary of watching and entrapment. Macro, in Act II, Scene II, speaks of being "engaged" and of "preparation to his fall"—language that blurs the line between political calculation and personal survival. Later, in Act IV, Latiaris instructs Rufus and Opsius to "place yourself between the roof and ceiling" to overhear Sabinus. The stage direction "They retire" is followed by a scene of deliberate entrapment. Jonson's characters do not simply plot; they speak in terms of "vantage," "stroke," and "sleight," as though every conversation is a potential trap. The word "spies" appears explicitly, and Sabinus laments that "our writings are, / By any envious instruments, that dare / Apply them to the guilty, made to speak / What they will have." This is a world where language itself is weaponized.

Verse as a Tool of Political Argument

Jonson varies his verse to reflect the speaker's position and intent. Agrippina, in Act II, Scene I, uses a more elevated, almost Senecan tone: "'Tis princely when a tyrant doth oppose, / And is a fortune sent to exercise / Your virtue, as the wind doth try strong trees." The simile is deliberate and philosophical, aligning her with stoic resistance. In contrast, Macro's soliloquy is terse and self-admonishing: "Macro, thou art engaged: and what before / Was public; now, must be thy private, more." The shift from third-person to first-person within the same speech mirrors his internalization of political necessity. Sabinus, in his exchange with Latiaris, employs a series of rhetorical questions that build to a bitter climax: "When ignorance is scarcely innocence; / And knowledge made a capital offence!" Jonson uses the verse line to create a rhythm of accusation and despair.

The Architecture of Intrigue: Stage Directions and Space

Jonson's stage directions are minimal but precise, often indicating physical positioning that mirrors the play's themes. In Act II, Scene III, the direction "Here place yourself between the roof and ceiling" is followed by "Shift to our holes with silence." The characters become hidden auditors, their bodies literally inserted into the architecture of the house. This spatial arrangement recurs: Agrippina's house is an "upper room" where private conversation is vulnerable; the street is where Macro plots alone. Jonson uses these settings to create a geography of suspicion. The play's Rome is a place where no space is truly private, and where the physical act of hiding or eavesdropping becomes a dramatic event. The repeated exits and re-entries—"Exeunt," "Exit," "Re-enter"—fragment the action into discrete, often clandestine encounters.

The Weight of Classical Allusion

Jonson's footnotes, though elided here, are a key feature of the original text. The play is saturated with references to Roman history and literature, from the mention of Germanicus to the invocation of "Jove" and the "genius of the Roman race." These allusions are not decorative; they serve as a framework for the characters' self-understanding. Agrippina appeals to her children's "birth and blood" and to the example of their father's fall. Latiaris evokes the "bright flame / Of liberty" that might be revived. Jonson's characters think of themselves as actors in a historical drama, and their language is laden with precedent. The play's argument, printed before the text, further signals Jonson's commitment to historical verisimilitude. Readers encountering the play today may find the density of allusion challenging, but it is integral to Jonson's method of constructing a tragedy that is both a political critique and a scholarly exercise.

The Rhetoric of Necessity and Fate

Throughout the excerpts, characters justify their actions by invoking necessity. Macro tells himself, "thine own fate confers necessity / On thy employment." Later, Opsius argues that "to do an office / So grateful to the state, I know no man / But would strain nearer bands, than kindred." This language of compulsion—"must," "cannot," "necessity"—pervades the play, creating a sense of inevitability even as characters make choices. Jonson does not present these justifications as straightforward; the audience sees the gap between public rhetoric and private ambition. Sabinus, in his speech, directly challenges this logic, asking what will become of the times "when to be high or noble, are made crimes." The play thus stages a debate about whether political action is ever truly free, or whether it is always constrained by the logic of power.

Readers approaching Sejanus: His Fall should attend to Jonson's careful construction of dialogue as a form of action. The play rewards attention to shifts in register, to the way characters echo or subvert each other's language, and to the physical staging of surveillance. The scholarly apparatus, though omitted here, is a reminder that Jonson intended his tragedy to be read as well as performed. For those interested in the politics of early modern drama, this play offers a stark, unromantic vision of power that contrasts sharply with the more celebratory tones of contemporary chronicle plays.

Related eBooks